Patient: 87-year-old woman; admitted due to two syncopes;
Case Summary
0 of 1 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
Information
You have already completed the case before. Hence you can not start it again.
Case is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the case.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 1 questions answered correctly
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
-
Syncope, left bundle branch block and second-degree atrioventricular block type 1
ECG 7A: Sinus rhythm, left atrial enlargement (widened and fragmented P wave); left bundle branch block: QRS width > 120 ms; absence of q wave along with wide and notched R wave in leads I, aVL, V5 and V6 with delayed intrinsicoid deflection > 60 ms; QS and rS pattern in V1 and V2; ST segment depression and negative T wave in leads I, aVL, V5 and V6;
ECG 7B: Left bundle branch block; bradycardia associated with a Mobitz 1 second-degree AV block pattern; gradual prolongation of the PR interval followed by blocked P wave (Wenckebach periods);
Comments: This patient presented with a syncope which resulted in a fall with bleeding scalp wound. The electrocardiogram revealed a characteristic pattern of complete left bundle branch block. During an episode of lightheadedness, the ECG showed a bradycardia in conjunction with a second-degree (Mobitz 1) AV block pattern.
When there is an associated branch block, a second-degree AV block with Wenckebach periodicity may result from a slowing of conduction in the atrioventricular node, but should also raise suspicion and warrant investigation for a delayed activation on the branch opposite to the blocked branch (trifascicular block). The infra-Hisian Wenckebach periods in these instances are associated with a constant AH interval and a gradual prolongation of the HV interval, the blocked P wave being followed by a His potential not conducted to the ventricle.
The indications for implantation in the setting of second-degree AV block type 1 are controversial. The causal relationship between conduction disorder and the onset of symptoms is difficult to establish, especially when the symptoms are modest and unspecific. There is a class IIA indication in the European guidelines when a second-degree AV block type 1 is responsible for symptoms or when the conduction disorder is of intra- or infra-Hisian localization (major risk of progression to a complete atrioventricular block) upon electrophysiological study (EPS). This patient underwent an EPS which confirmed the presence of a trifascicular block and underwent pacemaker implantation.
Take-home message: When associated with a bundle branch block, a second-degree AV block Wenckebach type pattern may result from a delayed conduction in the atrioventricular node but should raise suspicion and warrant exploring for a delayed activation on the opposite branch of the blocked branch (trifascicular block). Electrophysiological study may reveal a prolonged HV interval.
- 1
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 1
1. Question
Which diagnosis(es) is(are) true for this ECG?
CorrectIncorrect